Q&A
1. Based on any feedback that may have been received in the previous discussion forum, the revision of first annotation.
Revising an annotation is vital, especially if the target audience is unsure of the source’s relevance. However, as of this moment, I have not received comments requesting for a revision.
2. Finding another source and composing a second annotation
The second annotation is:
Ndlozi, M.Q. 2014. Here is the EFF Manifesto, each page is critical…let us spread it to all corners of South Africa for victory on 7 May, 2014. Facebook. Available, [Online]: https://www.facebook.com/mbuyiseni/posts/10152268973774066 Accessed: 30 March 2017.
Link: http://mittaxinindlu.weebly.com/mbuyiseni-ndlozi.html
For example, the second annotation is a parliament member; therefore, his article pertains important information that has major influence to this research.
3. Both annotations posted in the writer’s journal
The following links will enable the reader to access the annotations in discussion
Link 1: http://mittaxinindlu.weebly.com/henrik-van-broekhuizen.html
Link 2: http://mittaxinindlu.weebly.com/mbuyiseni-ndlozi.html
4. Next research steps (what is the next kind of source to be analysed, and where will it be obtained?)
This research will consider six annotations, which are all related to one another and to the topic. These sources address the same topic from different angles; therefore, enabling the reader and/or author to make useful conclusions and produce effective results. The other sources that will be discussed include Twitter, a Black graduate, and an author/columnist. The internet is a platform from which some of these sources will be obtained. Additionally, I have secured interviews to obtain primary data.
5. Sketching a schedule that outlines how the process will be completed in gathering annotated bibliography by the due date.
The work has already commenced. Each annotation is given at least two hours per day. However, the collection of data is on a continuous basis. One - two weeks will be enough for this subject to be closed effectively.
The proposed process is as following:
(i) contact source;
(ii) analyse source;
(iii) request an interview for more information, or consult with secondary sources to obtain more information;
(iv) write notes;
(v) process notes; and
(vi) write a complete annotation.
1. Based on any feedback that may have been received in the previous discussion forum, the revision of first annotation.
Revising an annotation is vital, especially if the target audience is unsure of the source’s relevance. However, as of this moment, I have not received comments requesting for a revision.
2. Finding another source and composing a second annotation
The second annotation is:
Ndlozi, M.Q. 2014. Here is the EFF Manifesto, each page is critical…let us spread it to all corners of South Africa for victory on 7 May, 2014. Facebook. Available, [Online]: https://www.facebook.com/mbuyiseni/posts/10152268973774066 Accessed: 30 March 2017.
Link: http://mittaxinindlu.weebly.com/mbuyiseni-ndlozi.html
For example, the second annotation is a parliament member; therefore, his article pertains important information that has major influence to this research.
3. Both annotations posted in the writer’s journal
The following links will enable the reader to access the annotations in discussion
Link 1: http://mittaxinindlu.weebly.com/henrik-van-broekhuizen.html
Link 2: http://mittaxinindlu.weebly.com/mbuyiseni-ndlozi.html
4. Next research steps (what is the next kind of source to be analysed, and where will it be obtained?)
This research will consider six annotations, which are all related to one another and to the topic. These sources address the same topic from different angles; therefore, enabling the reader and/or author to make useful conclusions and produce effective results. The other sources that will be discussed include Twitter, a Black graduate, and an author/columnist. The internet is a platform from which some of these sources will be obtained. Additionally, I have secured interviews to obtain primary data.
5. Sketching a schedule that outlines how the process will be completed in gathering annotated bibliography by the due date.
The work has already commenced. Each annotation is given at least two hours per day. However, the collection of data is on a continuous basis. One - two weeks will be enough for this subject to be closed effectively.
The proposed process is as following:
(i) contact source;
(ii) analyse source;
(iii) request an interview for more information, or consult with secondary sources to obtain more information;
(iv) write notes;
(v) process notes; and
(vi) write a complete annotation.